This is a one-line disposition order closing the revision petition as nothing remained to be decided after a connected interim order was vacated in the main suit, which is still pending.
Revision petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010077622021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(I/O)/33/2021
SALIMUR RAHMAN S/O LATE SAIFUR RAHMAN R/O HOUSE NO. 182 SIXMILE JAYANAGAR P.O. KHANAPARA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
VERSUS PRASANT KUNDU S/O SRI PRAHLAD KUNDU R/O FLAT NO. 5(A) GULSHAN RESIDENCY NEAR SUPER MARKET TRAFFIC POINT G.S. ROAD P.S. DISPUR GHY 781006 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
-----------Advocate for : MR. M KHAN Advocate for : appearing for PRASANT KUNDU
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
12.08.2021
Since, an order has been passed today in the connected I.A. i.e. I.A.(Civil) No. 1015/2021, vacating the interim order dated 19.03.2021. Sri M. Khan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner (opposite party) submits that there is nothing left to be decided in the revision petition.
Sri G. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the parties may contest in the suit, which is pending for hearing.
In view of the above, the revision petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Salimur Rahman
Prasant Kundu
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
