The Gauhati High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the day of hearing after being informed about previous non-appearance.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010219542012
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/292/2012
SMTI RENUKA DEVI and 9 ORS.
W/O LATE NADIA BIHARI NATH, ON THE DEATH OF SHANKAR NATH, HIS LEGAL HEIRS
4: 2.C. SHRUTI NATH D/O LATE SHANKAR NATH
8: 6. SMTI RATNA DEVI
9: 7. SMTI RITA DEVI
10: 8. SMTI GAYATRI DEVI
11: 9. SMTI CHITRA NATH
Page No.# 2/3
12: 10. SMTI SUKLA NATH
PETITIONER NOS. 3 TO 10 ARE THE SONS AND DAUGHTER OF LATE NADIA BIHARI NATH ORIGINAL PLANINTIFF ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE REPRESENTED BY PETITIONER NO.1 AS THEIR CONSTITUTED ATTORNY ALL ARE R/O CHURCH ROAD KARIMGANJ TOWN P.O. P.S. and DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSA
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF JHUMARMAL BOTHRA ORIDINGAL DEFENDANT ... and ORS
AND RAMI DEVI BOTHRA, THEIR LEAGAL HEIRS
2:ISWARCHAND BOTHRA
3:PUNAMCHAND BOTHRA
4:MAGNAMAL BOTHRA
ALL ARE SONS OF LATE JHUMARMAL BOTHRA AND ARE R/O MADAN MOHAN ROAD KARIMGANJ TOWN C/O M/S PUNAM TEXTILES P.O. P.S. AND DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B C DAS
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
Date : 15-11-2021
On 02.11.2021, when the matter was called, none appeared for the
Page No.# 3/3
petitioner and we had adjourned the matter by observing that in the event none appeared on the subsequent call, adverse order shall follow.
Again when the matter was called on 11.11.2021, none appeared for the petitioner and we required the Registry to inform the learned senior counsel for the petitioner about the non-appearance with a request to appear on the next call.
Accordingly, we have been informed that the learned senior counsel was informed by the Registry on 11.11.2021.
Today again when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioner.
The petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
D/SHANKAR NATH, HIS LEGAL HEIRS
JHUMARMAL BOTHRA ORIDINGAL
RAMI DEVI BOTHRA
ISWARCHAND BOTHRA
PUNAMCHAND BOTHRA
MAGNAMAL BOTHRA
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
