Petition allowed with liberty to file afresh before appropriate forum. No substantive reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010028782020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./186/2021
SYED BASIT AMIRUL HUSSAIN AND ANR. S/O-SYED NAZIM ALI,R/O-VILL-KHARIKOT NO.2,P.O.KHARIKOT,DISTKAMRUP(R),ASSAM
VERSUS
MOMITA RAHMAN
D/O-MUJIBUR RAHMAN,W/O-SYED BASIT AMIRUL HUSSAIN,R/O-BYE LANE NO.2,MOTHER TERESA PATH,SIJUBARI,HATIGAON,P.SHATIGON,DIST-KAMRUP(M),ASSAM-781038
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS S.KANUNGOE,MS J.CHETTRY Advocate for the Respondent : M.R. H.S. KALSI, MR. I.S. KALSI, MS. N.K. PODDAR
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
O R D E R
01.11.2021
As has been sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file afresh, before the appropriate forum.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SYED BASIT AMIRUL HUSSAIN AND ANR.
MOMITA RAHMAN
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
