Disposed
Bijay Bhusan Bharatiya Borah v. the State of Assam and Anr.
Gauhati HCCrl.Rev.P./142/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010083852021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010083852021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010083852021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./142/2021
BIJAY BHUSAN BHARATIYA BORAH
S/O BUDHENDRA NATH BORAH, R/O NEHRU PARK, JORHAT, P.S.-JORHAT, DIST-JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785001
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:SMTI. VIMLA DEVI GATTANI W/O SRI RAM KRISHAN GATTANI R/O A.T. ROAD WARD NO. 4 OF JORHAT TOWN P.S.-JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN ORDER
17.12.2021
Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the
Page No.# 2/2
petition.
In view of the above submission, the petition stands disposed of on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bijay Bhusan Bharatiya Borah
The State of Assam and Anr Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam
Smti. Vimla Devi Gattani W/o Sri Ram Krishan Gattani
Rumi Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court