The Gauhati High Court, in an interlocutory application, granted the petitioner an extension of five days to appear before the Investigating Officer due to a lack of communication regarding the antecedent order.
Allowed another 5 days' time to appear before the IO.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010201112021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/523/2021 In AB No. 3342/2021
NURUL HOQUE SARKAR
S/O- ABDUL MOZID SARKAR, R/O- VILL.-ASHARIKANDI, P.O. ASHARIKANDI, P.S. GAURIPUR, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783331.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.J AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN ORDER
01.12.2021
By this application, the petitioner has sought for extension of time to appear before the IO, in terms of order dated 29.10.2021, passed in AB No. 3342/2021.
Heard the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to lack of communication between the parties, the matter could not be communicated to the petitioner, as a result of which, he could not appear before the IO, within 10 days from the date of order. The
Page No.# 2/2
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has undertaken to appear before the IO.
Accordingly, he is allowed another 5 (five) days’ time to appear before the IO. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nurul Hoque Sarkar
The State of Assam
Rumi Kumari Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
