Dharampal v. the State of Assam and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court rejected an application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by the accused in a case involving commercial quantity of morphin powder, as no material was placed to satisfy the requirements under Section 37(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act for release.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer rejected; case diary returned.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010020552021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./350/2021
DHARAMPAL
S/O LATE RAM SINGH, R/O VILL-THALA, P.S.-JAGO, DIST-SOLAN, STATEHIMACHAL PRADESH, PIN-173208
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:MAINUL HOQUE CHOUDHURY S/O LATE NACHIR ALI SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE RANGIA G.R.P.S. RANGIA DIST-KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78135
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioner holding contraband in commercial quantity pending satisfaction under Section 37(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.
Whether the statutory period prescribed for investigation is complete in a case involving commercial quantity of narcotics justifying default bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dharampal S/O Late Ram Singh
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- Bail Appln./350/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court