Allowed

Ruhul Amin @ Rubul v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC15 Nov 2021Bail Appln./2990/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court granted bail to the applicant in a case under Sections 353, 325, and 224 IPC. Considering the applicant's long period of detention and injured condition, the Court deemed further custody un-called for and directed release on a bond with surety.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one local surety of like amount.

Ruhul Amin @ Rubul Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2021)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC010177792021

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : Bail Appln./2990/2021

¶5

RUHUL AMIN @ RUBUL SON OF ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILL- AKABASTI BENGALI GAON, P.S. CHARIDUAR DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶9

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Date : 15-11-2021

¶12

Heard Mr. G. Phukan, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Addl. P.P. Assam appearing for the State who has produced the Case Diary.

¶13

By filing this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the applicant is seeking his release on bail in connection with Chariduar P.S. Case No. 171/2021 registered under

¶14

Page No.# 2/2

¶15

Sections 353/325/224 IPC.

¶16

The applicant was arrested on 20-09-2021 and since then he is in custody.

¶17

By referring to the materials on record, Mr. Phukan submits that the maximum period of detention in this case is 60 days and the applicant has already spent 56 days in custodial detention. Under the circumstances, his prayer for release on bail be considered.

¶18

On a query made by this court Mr. Das, learned Addl. P.P. Assam could not state with any degree of certainty as to whether there is chance of completion of the investigation within next 4 to 5 days. That apart, the applicant appears to be admitted in the hospital in an injured condition.

¶19

Having regard to the length of detention of the applicant and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that further custodial detention of the applicant would be un-called for in this case. As such, the applicant, viz. Ruhul Amin @ Ruhul is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonitpur at Tezpur.

¶20

Bail application stands disposed of.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

¶23

Comparing Assistant

Ruhul Amin @ Rubul v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruhul Amin @ Rubul v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Habijur Rahman @ Hafijur Rahman @ Habu Vs the State of Assam

Arjun Taid Vs the State of Assam

Nitesh Kumar Vs the State of Assam

Elahia Ahmod @ Md. Ahia Ali @ Ehia Ahmed @ Ahia Alom and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Sunanda Das Vs the State of Assam

Jonmani Kalita and Anr. Vs the State of Assam