Padum Borah v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected a regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The court held that the accused, a government teacher, was complicit in the alleged offence of cheating and forgery regarding the purchase of land as he knowingly included the wrong patta number in the agreement. Bail was denied at this stage.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010173602021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2860/2021
PADUM BORAH S/O MANIRAM BORA R/O VILL- BHUKTABARI P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP.BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D SARMAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the accused petitioner who is in custody for allegedly defrauding the informant of money through a false sale agreement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Padum Borah
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Rumi Kumari Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- Bail Appln./2860/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court