Nurul Islam and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court was satisfied that the offences charged, including Section 354 IPC requiring an absence of attraction in the facts, did not warrant custodial interrogation. The court allowed the bail petition under Section 438 CrPC regarding a land dispute case involving injuries and made an earlier interim order absolute.
What did the court decide?
Bail petition under Section 438 CrPC allowed; interim order granted earlier made absolute; case diary returned.