The High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner had been arrested in the interim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010153092021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2913/2021
NELAMATI BORO @ RITA BORO D/O BABURAM BORO R/O LOKHRA DAILY BAZAR, P.S. GORCHUK, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DITUL DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
17-11-2021
The petitioner is represented by Mr. D. Das, learned counsel.
The State Respondent is represented by Ms. S.H. Borah, learned
Page No.# 2/2
Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this petition has become infructuous since the petitioner has been arrested in the meantime.
That being so, this petition stands disposed of being infructuous, at the request of Mr. Das, learned counsel.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
NELAMATI BORO @ RITA BORO
THE STATE OF ASSAM
HITESH KUMAR SARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
