Dandi Basumatary v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court rejected the petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. because illegal arms were recovered from his possession, finding the case inappropriate for such bail relief.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. rejected; petition disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010137342021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2615/2021
DANDI BASUMATARY S/O SAMENDRA BASUMATARY VILL- KUSUNGDWISA P.O. SANTIPUR, P.S. RUNIKHATA DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN-783375
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dandi Basumatary
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/2615/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court