Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Harish Nagar Tea Estate
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010017662020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010017662020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010017662020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 622/2020
1:REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER REGIONAL PF OFFICE, NORTH EASTERN REGION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICES, NEAR BHOLAGIRI ASHRAM, AIRPORT ROAD, AGARTALA799006
VERSUS
1:HARISH NAGAR TEA ESTATE
PROP ANIL PLANTATIONS PVT LTD, P.O- HARISH NAGAR CAMP, VIA BISHALGARH- 799102 (TRIPURA -WEST)
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DILIP DEY Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
Date : 03-02-2020
Heard Mr. D. Dey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
This writ petition is against the order passed in Provident Fund (Appeal) No. 5/2017 by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Guwahati that arouse from the order dated 03.02.2012 passed by the learned Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Agartala, Tripura in ATA 345(2)/2012.
It is seen that both the petitioner as well as the sole respondent are from the State of Tripura.
Considering the above, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw this writ petition and to file before the Appropriate Court for redressal of its grievances.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
HARISH NAGAR TEA ESTATE
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court