Bishnu Basumatary v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010261682017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010261682017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010261682017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5880/2017
BISHNU BASUMATARY
S/O LT. MUHIRAM BASUMATARY R/O VILL- MAYA RAM BASUMATARY P.O. BAKULIA P.S. BAKULIA DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS.
REP. BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, PWD ROADS, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -6, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.U K BARMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
ORDER
Date : 01-12-2020
Heard Mr. N. Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1 and 2. Ms. S. Kemprai, learned counsel appears for respondent nos. 3 to 7.
Mr. Anand submits that the relief prayed for has been granted although there may be an issue with regard to non-payment of that part between what has been paid and the revised amount to the petitioner since February, 2016. In so far as the present writ petition is concerned and having regard to the prayer made, Mr. Anand submits that the same has become infructuous. On the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as being rendered infructuous.
Petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again if aggrieved of non-payment of any revised amount, as indicated above.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bishnu Basumatary
The State of Assam
Manojit Bhuyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court