Disposed

Sangita Chopra v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Gauhati HC19 Nov 2020WP(C)/5750/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim application for correction, the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court ordered that a clerical error in a judgment recording the original petitioner's name be rectified to reflect the correct petitioner name as Sangita Chopra.

What did the court decide?

Correction of name 'original petitioner (Om Prakash Rathi)' to 'petitioner (Sangita Chopra)' in the connected judgment.

Sangita Chopra Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010185162020

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2230/2020

¶5

SMT. SANGITA CHOPRA

¶6

W/O- SHRI VIJAY KUMAR CHOPRA, SIDDHARTH RESIDENCY, 4TH FLOOR, JAIN GALI, PALTANBAZAR, NEAR MEGHDOOT CINEMA HALL, GUWAHATI- 781008, ASSAM.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

¶9

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

¶10

2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001

¶11

3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI-781001

¶12

4:NIRMAL KUMAR AGARWALLA ROOM NO. G-14 GROUND FLOOR PARMESHWARI BUILDING CHATRIBARI GUWAHATI-781001 (ASSAM

¶13

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. V K CHOPRA

¶14

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE

¶15

Page No.# 2/3

¶16

Linked Case : WP(C)/5750/2019 SANGITA CHOPRA W/O- SHRI VINAY KUMAR CHOPRA SIDDHARTH RESIDENCY 4TH FLOOR JAIN GALI PALTANBAZAR NEAR MEGHDOOT CINEMA HALL GUWAHATI- 781008 ASSAM. EMAIL- [email protected]. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.- 781006. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) PANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001. 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE O/O. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GHY.- 781001. 4:NIRMAL KUMAR AGARWALLA ROOM NO. G-14 GROUND FLOOR PARMESHWARI BUILDING CHATRIBARI GUWAHATI- 781001 (ASSAM). -----------Advocate for : MR. V K CHOPRA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

¶17

Page No.# 3/3

¶18

BEFORE

¶19

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Date : 08.02.2021

¶22

Heard Shri A. K. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the applicant petitioner who has file this application for correction of a trivial error occurring in the judgment dated 19.11.2020 passed in the connected writ petition WP (C) No. 5750/2019. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned standing counsel for the Review Department.

¶23

Shri Purkayastha, learned counsel has submitted that since a number of cases were disposed of by separate judgments on the same date where the issues were identical, the error in recording the name of the petitioner has occurred.

¶24

By referring to the second line in paragraph – 2, the learned counsel submits that instead of the expression “original petitioner (Om Prakash Rathi)”, it should be “petitioner Sangita Chopra)”.

¶25

After hearing the parties, it is directed that the expression “original petitioner (Om Prakash Rathi)”, be read as “petitioner (Sangita Chopra)”.

¶26

To remove any further confusion and difficulty, the present order may be treated as a part of the order date 19.11.2020.

¶27

I.A. accordingly disposed of.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Sangita Chopra v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangita Chopra v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nowshad Ali Vs the State of Assam and 8 Ors.

Jeher Khan and 7 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 9 Ors.

Deba Kumar Das Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Dibyalata Roy Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Shesh Kant Sharma Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Pankaj Kr. Baishya Vs Mridul Kr. Rabha and 6 Ors.