The writ petition allowed when the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Court again, which was granted, resulting in dismissal on withdrawal.
Leave and liberty to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Court again if so advised, was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010171072020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5043/2020
ABDUL AMTLIB LASKAR AND 5 ORS
S/O ASADDAR ALI LASKAR, R/O GOBINDAPUR, P.O. GOBINDAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM
5: KSH. DHARMENDRA SINGHA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
TO BE REP. BY THE SECRETARY LAND AND REVENUE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CAHCAR
4:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICE
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : SC. REVENUE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
ORDER
Date : 02-12-2020
Heard Dr. B. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2, whereas Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel appears for respondent nos. 3 and 4.
Dr. Ahmed seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition from file with liberty to approach this Court again, if so advised.
Leave and liberty stands granted.
Writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Abdul Amtlib Laskar and 5 Ors
The State of Assam
Manojit Bhuyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
