A writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the Gauhati High Court with liberty to file afresh as per the petitioner's request filed through a different representative.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010013772014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4131/2014
1:JIRSONG TERANG,
S/O PHODING TERANG, R/O RONGKHELAN, W/NO.8, P.O. DIPHU, DISTKARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM and 7 ORS,
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF FOREST and ENVIRONMENT DIPSUR, GHY-6
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPTT. DISPUR
GHY-6
3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST and ENVIRONMENT DEPTT. REHABARI GHY-8
5:THE CHAIRMAN APSC KHANAPARA GHY-22
6:THE DY. SECRY. APSC KHANAPARA GHY-22
Page No.# 2/2
7:THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION APSC KHANAPARA GHY-22
8:BIKRAM SINGH RONGPI S/O SENG RONGPI VILL. SATGGAON WEST KARBI ANGLONG P.O. DONGKAMOKUM P.S. BAITHALANGSO DIST- KARBI ANGLON
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.M KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.R HASSAN
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 03-02-2020
Ms. A. Ronghangi appearing on behalf of Mr. U.K. Barman, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that they have received instructions to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed.
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Jirsong Terang
The State of Assam and 7 Ors.
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
