Ranjit Barman @ Ranjit Chandra Barman and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010117362015 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What did the court decide?
the writ petition has been disposed of as infructuous
GAHC010117362015 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
the writ petition has been disposed of as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010117362015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 3495/2015
1:RANJIT BARMAN @ RANJIT CHANDRA BARMAN and 2 ORS. S/O- LT. SURESH BARMAN, VILL.- KALPANI, P.O.- NIMUA VIA BARPETA ROAD, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BABUPARA, WARD NO. 7, BARPETA ROAD, P.O. and P.S.- BARPETA ROAD, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM.
2: DIGANTA CHOUDHURY S/O- LT. DINESH CHOUDHURY VILL.- BARTARY P.O.- SONAFULLY P.S.- BARPETA ROAD DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM.
3: RANJITA PATHAK S/O- LT. LANKESWAR PATHAK VILL. and P.O.- AKAYA P.S.- PATACHARKUCHI DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PERSONNEL B DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT and RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GHY- 6.
Page No.# 2/3
DISPUR GHY- 6. 4:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI. 5:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI. 6:THE DY. COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 7:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPEA ZILLA PARISHAD BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K R PATGIRI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCER3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
ORDER
Date : 10-02-2020
Mr. M. Sarania, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioners has been regularized in their service, therefore, the writ petition has become infractuous.
Ms. M.D Borah, learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State
Page No.# 3/3
respondents.
In view of the submission of Mr. Sarania, this writ petition is disposed of as infractuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
RANJIT BARMAN AND ORS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
SANGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court