The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to subsequent developments in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010010362016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1434/2016
SMT. SAHIDA BEGUM LASKAR
W/O- LT. MD. FAKURUDDIN LASKAR, PRESENTLY RESIDED AT QUARTER NO. 1, NHPC COLONY, SUBANSIRI, LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT, P.O.- GERUAMUKH, DIST.- DHEMAJI, ASSAM AND PERMANENT R/O VILL.BANSKANDI PART- II, P.O.- BANSKANDI, P.S.- LAKHIPUR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA and 7 ORS REP. BY THE SECY., MINISTRY OF POWER, NEW DELHI.
2:THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA.
3:THE GENERAL MANAGER MEDICAL NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA.
4:THE CHIEF HR ESTT. NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 5:THE CHIEF P-HR-III NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION FARIDABAD HARYANA. 6:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR H.R. DEPTT.
Page No.# 2/2
SUBHANSIRI LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. GERUAMUKH VIA GOGAMUKH DIST.- DHEMAJI ASSAM. 7:THE CHIEF ENGINEER H.R. DEPTT. SUBHANSIRI LOWER HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. GERUKAMUKH VIA GOGAMUKH DIST.- DHEMAJI ASSAM. 8:THE DY. MANAGER M TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION NO. 1 LOKTAK H.E. PROJECT MANIPUR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.M R HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
ORDER
08.12.2020
Heard Mr. A.Y. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Roy, learned counsel representing respondent no.1. Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for respondent nos.2 to 8.
Mr. A.Y. Choudhury fairly submits that due to subsequent development in the case, the writ petition has become infructuous.
On his prayer, this writ petition stands dismissed as being rendered infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smt. Sahida Begum Laskar
The Union of India
The Chairman Cum Managing Director National Hydroelectric Power Corporation
Manojit Bhuyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
