Writ petition dismissed as not pressed by counsel on submission that petitioner had already received the relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010008542020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1034/2020
VIVEKANANDA DAS
S/O- BINODE BEHARI DAS, R/O- MOHANPUR PT-6, P.O. MOHANPUR, DIST.HAILAKANDI, PIN- 788150, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.- 781006.
2:THE COMM. AND SECY.
GOVT. OF ASSAM
3:THE COMM. AND SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM
4:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM
5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
6:DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI
7:THE TREASURY OFFICER HAILAKANDI
Page No.# 2/2
8:THE HEAD MASTE
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
12-11-2020
Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. J. Khataniar, learned Standing counsel, Elementary Education Department as well as Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department for the respondents.
Mr. Dutta, learned counsel on instruction, submits that the petitioner has already got the relief and as such, he is not pressing this writ petition.
In view of above, this writ petition being not pressed stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Vivekananda Das
The State of Assam
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
