Application not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Accordingly, the application stands closed without being pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040001772019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 57/2019
1:SMTI YAKEN ROME W/O LT. ONYOK ROME PROPRIETOR ROME WOOD INDUSTRY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NGOPOK PO MEBO PS PASIGHAT DIST. EAST SIANG AP 791102. PHONE NO. 9436043066
VERSUS
1:SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGHLA S/O SRI JAILAL AGGARWAL PERMANENT RESIDENT OF 2601 MOHINDER APARTMENTS PLOT 17 SECTOR-12 DWARKA PO DWARKA PS DWARKA NORTH NEW DELHI-110078
Advocate for the Petitioner : R Bori Advocate for the Respondent : MrO Pada
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 03-02-2020
Heard Mr. S. Taye, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. G. Loyi, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1.
Upon instruction, the learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application. Accordingly, this application stands closed, having not being pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smti Yaken Rome
Sri Praveen Kumar Singhla
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
