Sahad Ali Ahmed and Anr. v. Sri Sanjib Kumar Bhuyan and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court held the present writ petition closed as infructuous on the submission that the challenged order has already been complied with.
The Gauhati High Court held the present writ petition closed as infructuous on the submission that the challenged order has already been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010094792018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 185/2018
1:SAHAD ALI AHMED AND ANR. S/O- MD. OSMAN AKANDA, VILL- PADUPARI, P.O- LALPOOL, P.SDALGAON, DIST- DARRANG,ASSAM, PIN-
2: JILLUL HOQUE S/O- LATE MAJIBUR RAHMAN VILL- KHETARCHAR P.O- KHARUPETIA P.S- KHARUPETIA DIST- DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 78411
VERSUS
1:SRI SANJIB KUMAR BHUYAN AND ORS.
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI- 781019
2:NAGEN CHANDRA BORO DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER DIST- DARRANG PIN- 784125
3:SRI PREETOM KR. SAIKIA IAS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. A. Deka, SC. Edu.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH order
06-01-2020
Mr. A. Matin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become
infructuous as the order passed has already been complied with.
Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel appears for the respondent no.4.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SAHAD ALI AHMED AND ANR.
SRI SANJIB KUMAR BHUYAN AND ORS.
N. KOTISWAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court