Miss Sahida Begum and Anr. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a kidnapping case. The High Court noted the victim had married the accused and lived in UP, receiving evidence via WhatsApp. Holding custodial detention unwarranted for investigation, the application was allowed with a bail bond and standard conditions to prevent tampering.
What did the court decide?
Pre-arrest bail accepted upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two local sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding investigation and travel.