The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail application as infructuous after learning that the accused had already been arrested and produced before the judicial magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010007032020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB 177/2020
1:PARTHA PRATIM DAS @ SUNTI @ HUNTI DAS S/O. SRI MITHA RAM DAS, R/O. VILL. TELEGANIA, P.S. BEHALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM, PIN-784166.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE SPL. P.P. FOREST DEPTT., ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P KATAKI
Advocate for the Respondent : SPECIAL PP ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
ORDER
Date : 13-02-2020
Learned counsel for the respondent has apprised this Court by producing a copy of the report from the Range Forest Officer, Crime Investigation Range, Biswanath Chariali, that the accused, Partha Pratim Das @ Sunti @ Hunti Das has been arrested on 09.02.2020 and he has been produced before the learned SDJM, Biswanath Chariali.
In view of above, the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
PARTHA PRATIM DAS @ SUNTI @ HUNTI DAS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
