Diganta Barkataki v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition regarding the die-in-harness scheme, the High Court held that the impugned speaking order was consequential to a prior SLC decision. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the prior rejection order before this Court.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to challenge the prior SLC decision rejecting his claim.