Petitioner applied to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court disposed of the writ petition on withdrawal without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010119762015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4901/2015
1:TRAILOKYA NATH
S/O LT. HARI PRASAD NATH, R/O GOJIAJANI, P.O. LALABORI-783126, DISTGOALPARA, ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM CHANDMARI GHY-3
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GOALPARA WATER RESOURCES DIVISION GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM
4:THE DY. COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.S BHUYAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAMR4
BEFORE
Page No.# 2/2
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 17-05-2019
Heard Ms. S. Newar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Doley, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent.
Upon instructions the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
wants to withdraw this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Trailoky Nath
The State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
