Petitioner's counsel withdrew the writ petition on instructions. The High Court roposed to close the matter without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010020552016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4226/2016
1:SANTOSH BHOWMIK
S/O LT. RAJENDRA LAL BHOWMIK, R/O W/NO.5, RANGPUR PT.4, SILCHAR9, CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER OF ASSAM, CO-OPERATIVE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
GHY-22
SILCHAR-1
4:THE CHIEF ELECTOL OFFICER DISPUR SECRETARIATE DISPUR-6 GUWAHATI ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.P DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
Date : 08-05-2019
Ms. S. Katakey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Upon instructions, she submits that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed having not been pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Santosh Bhowmik
The State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
