On default of the petitioner's appearance on three occasions, this writ petition filed by a teacher against state officials was closed and disposed of.
The writ petition is closed on default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010013202015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 2672/2015
1:SMTI. SMIRITI CHANDA
W/O- SRI RANJIT CHANDA, VILL.- NILAMBAZAR, THANA ROAD, P.O.NILAMBAZAR- 788722, DIST.- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELEMENTARY DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19.
3:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KARIMGANJ DIST. P.O.- KARIMGANJ- 788710 ASSAM.
4:THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KARIMGANJ DIST. P.O.- KARIMGANJ- 788710 ASSAM.
5:KAJAL KANTI DAS ASSTT. TEACHER BAZARGHAT M.V. SCHOOL P.O.- BAZARGHAT- 788733 DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.N DHAR
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.K KALITAR-5
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH
02-08-2019
Heard Ms. L. Marak, learned counsel for Respondent No.5.
No one appears for the petitioner today. On 13.8.2018, no one has also appeared for the petitioner. On 01.08.2018, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought for time to obtain instructions from his client.
It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue her claim.
In that view of the above, the writ petition stands closed on default.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smriti Chanda
The State of Assam and 4 Ors
N. Kotiswar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
