Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that notwithstanding the said position, the writ petitioner taking advantage of the said order is attempting to create a law and order situation despite the appellant having already taken a decision dated 26.3.2019 to run the Dhing Bazar (Athgaon Hat) themselves until further orders. In that view, learned counsel for the appellant seeks that this aspect of the matter be taken note by this Court. In that regard, what is relevant to be taken note is that the settlement made by the Dhing Municipal Board through the order dated 5.3.2019 for the year 2019-2020 is called in question in W.P.(C) No. 1910/2019. The settlement therein was in favour of respondent No.5 to the said writ petition. In the said writ petition, the learned Single Judge through the order dated 20.3.2019 has stayed the settlement order dated 5.3.2019. However, in so far as making alternative arrangement to run the Dhing Bazar (Athgaon Hat) in the interregnum, the learned Single Judge has left it to the respondent No.3 therein, namely, Dhing Municipal Board to take a decision. It is in that light, the resolution dated 26.3.2019 is passed by the appellant to run the Dhing Bazar (Athgaon Hat) themselves until further orders are passed. If that be the position, all that the appellant is required to do is to take note of the order dated 1.4.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 2194/2019 and intimate the petitioner