counsel for the appellants as also the learned Senior counsel for the respondents have put forth their contentions, what is necessary to be taken note of is that as rightly observed by the learned Single Judge in the order dated 13.07.2018, the order dated 31.05.2018, passed in WP(C) 3822/2017, was in the nature of a consent order and, in that light, the question of review of such order would not arise. On a perusal of the order dated 31.05.2018, it is noticed that in a circumstance where the members of the appellant association were required to submit documents in compliance of the provisions of the Assam Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as “1948 Act”) and when the petitioners therein had undertaken to submit documents and the official respondents had indicated that verification of such documents would be done in accordance with law, any other consideration, at this juncture, would not arise. In any event, the requirement, as contemplated under Section 31 of the 1948 Act, was taken note of by the learned Single Judge and the consideration was directed. At the first instance, through the said order, the learned Single Judge had directed that the applications filed by the members of the petitioner association shall not be entertained after 22.06.2018. For the said purpose, the learned Single Judge had also indicated that the members of the petitioner association shall appear before the official respondents on 20.06.2018 or 21.06.2018 or 22.06.2018 and submit applications along with documents. Since the members of the appellant association were unable to comply with the directions within the time-frame, an application in I.A. (Civil) 2092/2018 was filed before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge, through the order dated 30.08.2018, had extended the time for filing application till 13.07.2018 and, for the said purpose, had directed that submission of applications and appearance of the members of the petitioner association shall be on 11.07.2018 or 12.07.2018 or 13.07.2018.
