Goenka Enterprises v. Rajendra Prasad Boara
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant for default as the counsel did not appear to contend the matter.
The Gauhati High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant for default as the counsel did not appear to contend the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010012502008
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA 136/2008
1:GOENKA ENTERPRISES
REP. BY ITS PROP. SANKAR LALL GOENKA, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT KELVIN CINEMA COMPOUND, SRCB ROAD, GUWAHATI-1, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:RAJENDRA PRASAD BOARA
R/O BARTHAKUR MILS ROAD, ULUBARI, GHY-7, ASSAM.
2:M/S. ANUPAMA CINEMA
REP. BY ITS PROP. RAJENDRA PRASAD BORA MALIGAON GHY-11 ASSAM
3:ROBIN SARMA R/O NEAR ANUPAMA CINEMA HALL MALIGAON GHY-1
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A ROY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.P KATAKI, DK BAGCHI
BEFORE
CIVIL BENCH-I HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI
ORDER
Date : 10-09-2019
Page No.# 2/2
None appears for the appellant. This appeal is dismissed for default.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Goenka Enterprises
Rajendra Prasad Boara
M/s. Anupama Cinema
Robin Sarma
Mir Alfaz Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court