M/S Accekay Enterprise v. Bendangkokba and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition challenging non-compliance with directives to pay outstanding bills. Court closed the petition accepting the respondent's undertaking to pay the dues within four months.
What did the court decide?
Relief: Petition closed with direction to respondent No. 5 to release outstanding dues within 4 months from today.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC020000312017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : COP(C) 22/2017
1:M/S ACCEKAY ENTERPRISE
REPRESENTED BY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY, MR. VINOKA AYE, SON OF MR. TOKHEHO AYE, R/O HOUSE NO.333. PURANA BAZAR, DIMAPUR
VERSUS
1:BENDANGKOKBA AND 4 ORS.
SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, KOHIMA.
2:SHRI KHROSU RHETSO CHIEF ENGINEER PW.D. (R AND B) NAGALAND KOHIMA.
3:SHRI. TALITEMSU JAMIR EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. (R AND B) DIMAPUR
4:ABIO KIRE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed on the undertaking by the Finance Commissioner to pay outstanding dues within four months.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S ACCEKAY ENTERPRISE
- respondent
BENDANGKOKBA
- respondent
SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
- respondent
SHRI KHROSU RHETSO
- respondent
SHRI TALITEMSU JAMIR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- COP(C)/22/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court