Petitioner amended counsel asserted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court disposed of the matter as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010106902010
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4591/2010
1:CHANDAN SARMA
S/O SRI MADAN SARMA, R/O VILL. BORKURIHA, P.O. BORKURIHA, P.S.NALBARI, DIST NALBARI AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SILPUKHURI, P.O. AND P.S. CHANDMARI, GHY-3 IN THE DIST OF KAMRUP
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPTT, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT OF ASSAM GUWAHATI.
3:THE REGISTRAR LABOUR COURT ASSAM GUWAHATI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A DAS
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
JUDGMENT
13-02-2018.
The learned counsel Mr. A. Das, on instruction of the petitioner submits that the matter has
Page No.# 2/2
become infructuous. In view of such submission made by the petitioner’s lawyer, the case is disposed
of as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Chandan Sarma
The State of Assam
Hrishikesh Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
