Duleshwar Saikia v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner instructed not to press the application. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
Petitioner instructed not to press the application. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010073802018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 3338/2018
1:DULESHWAR SAIKIA
S/O. LATE KHEHETA SAIKIA, VILLAGE- PABHOJAN, P.O. AND P.S. BARPATHAR, DIST.- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT, ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOLAGHAT ASSAM.
4:THE CHAIRMAN BARPATHAR TOWN COMMITTEE BARPATHAR GOLAGHAT ASSAM.
5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPATHAR TOWN COMMITTEE BARPATHAR GOLAGHAT ASSAM.
6:THE CHAIRPERSON BOKAKHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD GOLAGHAT ASSAM.
7:THE CHAIRPERSON SIVASAGAR MUNICIPAL BOARD SIVASAGAR ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B N GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
ORDER
Date : 01-06-2018
Dr. B.N. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed not to press this application.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
J U D G E
M. Sharma
Comparing Assistant
Duleswar Saikia
The State of Assam and 6 ors.
Arup Kumar Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court