A review petition was dismissed by the Gauhati High Court because the learned counsel for the petitioner indicated no instructions were pressed to continue the proceedings.
Review petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010038842017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./141/2017
MUSTT NURZAHAN BARBHUAN and 5 ORS W/O LATE ENAMUL HAQUE BARBHUYAN
6: RAJIB BARBHUYA
VERSUS
MALINA BHOWMICK and 3 ORS
2:SMT. BIJOYA BHOWMICK
3:SOMA BHOWMICK
4:SMT. SUNANDA BHOWMIC
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.M SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.R P N SINGH
ORDER
Date : 05-01-2018
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
Mr. Atal Tiwari, learned counsel for the review petitioners submits that he has instructions not to press this review petition.
Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Review petition is dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Mustt Nurzahan Barbhuhan and 5 Ors
Malina Bhowmick and 3 Ors
Arup Kumar Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
