Petitioner moved to withdraw the bail application. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Withdrawal of bail application allowed; bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010135232018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln. 1381/2018
1:KRITIK RANJAN CHOUDHURY
S/O SRI BHABEN CHOUDHURY, R/O TARUN NAGAR, BYE LANE NO. 8, HOUSE NO. 35, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM,
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. B ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 02-07-2018
Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, Addl. P.P., Assam for the State.
Upon instruction, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this bail application.
The prayer is allowed.
Bail application is dismissed on withdrawal.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Kritik Ranjan Choudhury
The State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
