Corporation Bank versus M/S Ojjus Fidelity Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

The dispute between the^{parties having been referredfor determinationto the Special} Lok Adalat and the^{parties having compromised/settled the case/matter, the following} Award is^passed in terms^{of the Settlement'}

¶17

Present:- Mr. Hemraj Siddharth,^{Counselfor applicant bankalongwithMr.} Goverdhan Prasad,^{Assistant Manager, of applicant bank alongwith Ms.} Shreya Maheshwari, Nodal Officer

¶18

The Ld. Counsel for applicant^{bank alongwith Officers submitsthat bankhas received} an amount of Rs.27,55,OO,O0O/-^{towardsfull and final satisfactionof the claims of} the bank before Special^{Lok Adalat.}

¶19

l q ?:tkII0

¶20

Accordingly, the dispute^{betweenthe parties stands amicablysettled'}

¶21

This compromise settlement^{betweenthe partiesis suo mottoand with free will.}

¶22

In these circumstances, compromise^{is recorded. Now, the matterstand disposed of} in terms of compromise and^{the original documents,if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi} be returned to applicant^{bank.The date already fixed in the matter beforeDRT stands} cancelled. The file be consigned^{to record room.}

¶23

The applicant bank is at libefi^{to move an appropriate applicationfor seeking refund} of court fees.

¶24

ROAC Petitioner/APP!icant^ROAC

¶25

Defendant/Respondent

¶26

Officer) M-ember-I 9"\

¶27

(Presiding urricer) DRT-II, Delhi & Special Lok Adalat Judge

Corporation Bank v. M/S Ojjus Fidelity Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Corporation Bank v. M/S Ojjus Fidelity Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases