The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the present application by the applicant bank, which had submitted that the account in question had been closed. The application was dismissed as withdrawn. The file was consigned to records by the Presiding Officer.
The application was allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
r[ls74l2024
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK VS SH PRADEEP KUMAR GARG AND ORS
2s.05.2026
Item no. 55
Present Ms. Seema Gupta, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank has submitted that the account has been closed. Therefore, sherequested for withdrawal of thepresent TA. Requestis allowed.
In view of the above submission made by theLd. Counsel for applicant ban( TAno.57412024 is dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to records.
U\ (susHIL KUptAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Punjab and Sind Bank
Sh Pradeep Kumar Garg and ors
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
