The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an appeal and the withdrawal of the filed application after the matter between the parties was settled via a compromise proposal involving a payment of Rs. 55,72,72,882/-
Permission to withdraw the present application and return of original documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DebtsRecoverYTribunal-Il' Delhi
TAlt76l20.24 TNDTANBANK airitriilo Blq[-yt MR swArr CHAUDHARYAND ANR
Itemno'13
23.01.2026
Mr.RK Sinha, Counsel for applicant bank Present None fordefendants
,Matter is takenthrough Video Conferencing/Hybrid mode' IA no.451o12024has been filed by the applicant bank for witndrawatof the Present TA'
5,,
rx5:lirfi:i:rm,ir':t* outof the court'
'3;l;#13:i}Ifr[:r#r]];;;i'1q;::ht'Tlrr
fi#gliH##lffirTflHH#E:fr records.
Filebe consig ned to record room'
5,\
oTll",8,[8LH&" DRT-II,Delhi
TATA NAVALDOCKS LIMITED
CHAUDHARY AND ANR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
