The Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed the filed application as withdrawn because the applicant bank informed the court that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties.
Application dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/163312022
INDIABULLS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD Vs M/S.MKASSOCTATES&ORS
28.04.2026
Item no. 16
Present: Ms. Sana, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferenctngl hybrid Mode
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submits that thematterhas been settled between theparties. Sherequested for withdrawal of the present TA. Request is allowed.
In view of the above submission made by theld. Counselfcr applicant bank, TA 1633 12022 is dismissedas withdrawn,being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records.
<",,i (SUSHIL KUTIHR RASTOG r) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
li
INDIABULLS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
SUSHIL KUTIR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
