Dismissed
State Bank of India v. Suraj
DRTTA/1555/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed TA no. 1555/2023 as withdrawn by the applicant bank, which settled the claim and sought return of original documents. Pending IAs were disposed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Original documents directed to be returned to the applicant bank by the Registrar; pending applications disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
¶2
rA/lsssl2023
¶3
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS SURAIKUMAR
¶4
L9.06.2026
¶5
Item no. 13
¶6
Present: Shri Ankit Ahlawat, counselfor applicant bank. Matter is taken through Video ConferencinglHybridMode.
¶7
- IA no.t67012026 filed by theapplicantbank for earty hearing of the IA no. L20712026is hereby allowed.
¶8
- IA no.L20712026 has beenfiled by the applicant bank for withdrawal of thepresent matter.
¶9
- The Ld. Counsel for theapplicant bank submitted that the applicant bankhas receivedthe full and final settlement amount from defendantno.1 and no claim suruives. Therefore, theLd. Counselfor the applicant bank seekspermission towithdraw the present matter and fufther requestedfor return of original documents.
¶10
- In view of theabove submission, TA no.1555 12023 is dismissedas withdrawn.RegisttT is directed to return the originaldocumentsafter keeping the ceftified copies onrecord.IA no.L20712026 along withpending IAs, if any, disposed of accordingly.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Suraj Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court