Special Lok Adalat of DRT-II Delhi recorded a compromise between Union Bank of India and Sh. John Pacheco & Ors. upon receipt of Rs. 55.30 lakhs as full and final satisfaction. The matter was disposed of and the original documents returned to the bank.
Compromise recorded and matter disposed of; original documents returned to the bank; date before DRT cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
q)
I q 4- :c5 q\
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.II, DELHI
SPECTAL LOK ADALAT HELD ON 30.05.2026 (SATURDAY)
Organised Bv: DRT-II, Delhi
Authority: DSLS& Delhi
TAlL329l2023
Petitioner/Applicant : UNION BANK OF INDIA
Defendant/Respondent : SH. JOHN PACHECO & ORS.
No. of Proceedings of ut. ftgm NO.02 (SUp.) of the Tribunal
Name of Presiding Officer : Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi, Presiding Officer, DRT-II, Delhi & Special Lok Adalat Judge
Name of Members (1) Ms. Archana Sehgal, Recovely Officer-I
AWARD
This matter is taken by this Tribunal in hybrid mode i.e.physical as well as through Video Conferencing.
The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the Special Lok Adalat and the pafties having compromised/settled the case/matter, the following Award is passed in terms of the Settlement.
Present:- Mr. Hemraj Siddharth, Counsel for applicant bank alongwith Mr. Rishi Arora, Officer of applicant bank alongwith Ms. Shreya Maheshwari, Nodal Officer
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank alongwtih Officers submits that bank has received an amount of Rs.55,30,O00/- towards full and final satisfaction of the claims of the bank before Special Lok Adalat.
Accordingly, the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.
This compromise settlement between the parties is suo motto and with free will
In these circumstances, compromise is recorded. Now, the matter stand disposed of in terms of compromise and the original documents, if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returned to applicant bank. The date already fixed in the matter before DRT stands cancelled. The file be consigned to recoi'd room.
J
The applicant bank is at libefi to move an appropriate application for seeking refund of court fees.
W""{) ROAC
ROAC Petitioner/Applicant ROAC Defendant/Respondent ( Officer) Member-I -\ eli (Presiding .r...ber) DRT-II, Delhi & Special Lok Adalat Judge
Union Bank of India
Sh. John Pacheco & Ors.
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
