The applicant bank sought withdrawal of a Notice of Appointment for User/IP. The Division Bench allowed the withdrawal after an amicable settlement, resulting in dismissal of the user proceedings.
Withdrawal of the user proceedings allowed; TA dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAlLL4sl2023 CORPORATION BANK Vs MR GHANSHYAM SHARMA
L9.06.2026
Item no. 61
Present: Mr. Niranjan Das, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
File be consigned to record room.
-;^
I (susHrL KUrerAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Corporation Bank
Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
