Application maintained by ICICI Bank Limited was allowed the withdrawal and the matter was dismissed on the representation of settlement between the parties.
Application dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/113812023 ICICI BANK LIMITED VS SMT MAMTA CHAND AND ORS
29.0t.2026
Item no.B0
Present: Mr. Manish Yadav, Counsel for applicant bank Mr. Amol Choudhary, Counsel for defendant no.3 Mr. Siddharth Tewari, Counsel for defendant no.1 & 2
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submitted that thematter has been settled between theparties. He further submitsthat he wish to withdraw thepresent TA.
In view of the above submission made by the Ld. Counselfor applicant bank, TAltL38l2023 is dismissed aswithdrawn.
File be consigned to record room.
t) (susHIL rufi'nn RASToGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
ICICI BANK LIMITED
SMT MAMTA CHAND AND ORS
Sushil Rufi'sni Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
