The Special Lok Adalat recorded a compromise settlement between Corporation Bank and Mr. Unnish Nikarthil Parmbil Krishna regarding a disputed amount of Rs. 4,21,960. The tribunal disposed of the matter based on the parties' agreement.
Compromise settled; original documents returned to applicant bank; date fixed before DRT cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-b '(-il G>F( v tt0
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAI.II, DELHI
SPECIAL LOK ADALAT HELD ON 30.05.2026 (SATURDAY)
Oroanised Bv: DRT-II, Delhi
AuthoriW: DSLSA, Delhi
TA/106412024
Petitioner/Appticant : CORPORATION BANK Defendant/Respondent MR UNNISH NIKARTHIL PARMBIL KRISHNA
No. of Proceedings of the Item o.19 of the Tribuna!
Name of Prcsiding Officer : Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi, Presiding Officer, DRT-II, Delhi & Special Lok Adalat Judge
Name of Members(1) Ms. Archana Sehgal,RecovelyOfficer-I
AWARD
This matter is taken by this Tribunalin hybridmodei.e. physical as wellas through Video Conferencing.
The dispute between theparties having been referredfor determinationto the Special Lok Adalat and thepafties havingcompromised/settledthe case/matter, the following Award ispassed in terms of theSettlement'
Present:- Mr. Hemraj Siddharth,Counselfor applicant bankalongwith Mr. Rishi Arora, Officer of applicant bankalongwithMs. Shreya Maheshwari,Nodal Officer
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bankalongwith Officers submitsthat bank has received an amount of Rs.4,21,9601-and account has been regularized before Special Lok Adalat.
Accordingly, the dispute betweenthe parties stands amicably settled.
This compromise settlement betweenthe parties is suo mottoand with free will
In these circumstances, compromiseis recorded. Now, the matterstand disposed of in terms of compromise and theoriginal documents,if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returned to applicant bank.The date already fixed in the matter beforeDRT stands cancelled. The file be consignedto record room,
The applicant bank is at libefito move an appropriate applicationfor seeking refund of court fees.
w
ROAC Petitioner/APPlicantROAC Defendant/Respondent
( Officer) Memher-I
S-<sup>-'
(Presidinf Officer) DRT-II, Delhi & Special Lok Adalat Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CORPORATION BANK
MR UNNISH NIKARTHIL PARMBIL KRISHNA
Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Ms. Archana Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
