The Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed the matter as withdrawn. The applicant's counsel submitted that the auction amount was refunded and the dispute was settled between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/98/2026 ARTSIGNIA INNOVATIONS LLP VS UCO BANK
24.07.2026
Item no. 30
Present:
Ms. Prachi Darji, Counsel for applicant. Mr. Manish Kumar Pratishat, Counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that the auction amount has already been refunded by the respondent bank and the matter has already been settled between thepafties andshe wants to withdraw thepresent matter.
In view of the above submission made by the Ld. Counsel for applicant, 5A19812026 is dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room.
9\
(SUSHIL KUMNR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
c
ARTSIGNIA INNOVATIONS LLP
UCO BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
