I n thi s matter, the appl icant has stated to trespassed the pr operty on t he pretext of some all eged fire. It is admi tted by the counsel f or the appli cant that they are taki ng care of the pr operty so, i nstead of handi ng back the pr operty to the bank they are enjoyi ng the pr operty. The aucti on whi ch the appli cant has chall enged i n thi s Securitizati on Appli cati on had resulted i n fail ure and f urther acti ons of the banks whi ch were chall enged wer e not withi n the limi t ati on. The aucti on whi ch is schedul ed today has also resulted i n fail ure.