Dismissed
Ms Laxmi Tukaram Raibagi v. J C Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited
DRTSA/96/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 10.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.96 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. |
|||
| Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 29.12.2025 shows that no representation was made |
|||
| rst – 32 | by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.96 of 2024 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent No.1 (Mrs Uma S. Fadia)
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court