The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Special Appeal SA No. 95/2026 as withdrawn by the applicant, allowing the refund of court fees upon respondent's consent.
Withdrawal of the Special Appeal allowed; refund of court fees directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/es/2026 PINKI Vs ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
20.03.2026
Item no. 16
Present: Mr. G.S. Thakur, counsel for applicant. Mr. Rakesh Singh, counse! for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferenctngl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant submits that she wishes to withdrawal of the present SA and requested for refund of the couirt fees. Request is allowed.
The Ld. Counsel for the respondent FI has submitted thathe has no objection for the same.
In view of the above submission made by the ld. Counselfor applicant, SA 9512026 is dismissed as withdrawn.The Registry is directed to refund the couft fee asper rules to the applicant.
File be consigned to records.
9^
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Pinki
ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
