The Tribunal held that the applicant had complied with the earlier order of 09.06.2026. The respondent FI admitted recovery of the overdue amount. The application for restoration of possession was disposed of as infructuous.
Restored possession of subject property directed to respondents; Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl92l2026
RA,NESH THAKUR AND ORS VS HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
29.06.2026
Item no. 18
Present: Mr. R,R. Kumar, counsel for applicant. Mr. Gaurav Srivastava, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybridMode.
The Date alrcady fixed on 03.08.2026before this Tribunal stands cancelled.
File be consigned to recordroom.
€\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Ranesh Thakur and Ors
Hinduja Housing Finance Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
