This order records the withdrawal of a subsequent notice by the respondent bank due to a commitment to future compliance. The Tribunal permitted the issuance of a fresh notice and disposed of the securitization application.
Permitted the respondent to issue a fresh notice under Section 13(2) and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 45
Case No. SA/91/2026
LICHMA DEVI Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 23.07.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Ajay Swami, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ms. Priyanka Pareek, Liaison Officer of the respondent bank
In this matter, in view of the instruction from the bank, the officer of the respondent bank submitted that they will take care in future and they had highest regard for the Tribunal, therefore, they are withdrawing the subsequent notice issued. Further, requested to issue fresh notice under Section 13(2). They are permitted to do so.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands disposed of. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 provisions across 1 enactments
LICHMA DEVI
ICICI BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
